↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and safety of treatments used for polycystic ovarian syndrome management in adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness and safety of treatments used for polycystic ovarian syndrome management in adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13643-015-0105-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reem A. Al Khalifah, Iván D. Flórez, Brittany Dennis, Binod Neupane, Lehana Thabane, Ereny Bassilious

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 44 26%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 56 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,336
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,649
of 288,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.