↓ Skip to main content

Psycho-education with problem solving (PEPS) therapy for adults with personality disorder: A pragmatic multi-site community-based randomised clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psycho-education with problem solving (PEPS) therapy for adults with personality disorder: A pragmatic multi-site community-based randomised clinical trial
Published in
Trials, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary McMurran, Mike J Crawford, Joseph G Reilly, Paul McCrone, Paul Moran, Hywel Williams, Clive E Adams, Conor Duggan, Juan Delport, Diane Whitham, Florence Day

Abstract

Impairment in social functioning is a key component of personality disorder. Therefore psycho-education and problem solving (PEPS) therapy may benefit people with this disorder. Psycho-education aims to educate, build rapport, and motivate people for problem solving therapy. Problem solving therapy aims to help clients solve interpersonal problems positively and rationally, thereby improving social functioning and reducing distress. PEPS therapy has been evaluated with community adults with personality disorder in an exploratory trial. At the end of treatment, compared to a wait-list control group, those treated with PEPS therapy showed better social functioning, as measured by the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ). A definitive evaluation is now being conducted to determine whether PEPS therapy is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for people with personality disorder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 21 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#896,922
of 7,607,694 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#363
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,820
of 79,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,607,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.