↓ Skip to main content

The potential for immunoglobulins and host defense peptides (HDPs) to reduce the use of antibiotics in animal production

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential for immunoglobulins and host defense peptides (HDPs) to reduce the use of antibiotics in animal production
Published in
Veterinary Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13567-018-0558-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert van Dijk, Chris J. Hedegaard, Henk P. Haagsman, Peter M. H. Heegaard

Abstract

Innate defense mechanisms are aimed at quickly containing and removing infectious microorganisms and involve local stromal and immune cell activation, neutrophil recruitment and activation and the induction of host defense peptides (defensins and cathelicidins), acute phase proteins and complement activation. As an alternative to antibiotics, innate immune mechanisms are highly relevant as they offer rapid general ways to, at least partially, protect against infections and enable the build-up of a sufficient adaptive immune response. This review describes two classes of promising alternatives to antibiotics based on components of the innate host defense. First we describe immunoglobulins applied to mimic the way in which they work in the newborn as locally acting broadly active defense molecules enforcing innate immunity barriers. Secondly, the potential of host defense peptides with different modes of action, used directly, induced in situ or used as vaccine adjuvants is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,721,995
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#202
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,686
of 340,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.