↓ Skip to main content

Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010253.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luit Penninga, André Wettergren, Colin H Wilson, An-Wen Chan, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Christian Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 19 19%
Unspecified 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 51%
Unspecified 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#11,143,432
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,923
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,293
of 249,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#228
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.