↓ Skip to main content

Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates
Published in
Memory & Cognition, November 2010
DOI 10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer McCabe

Abstract

Two studies examined undergraduates' metacognitive awareness of six empirically-supported learning strategies. Study 1 results overall suggested an inability to predict the learning outcomes of educational scenarios describing the strategies of dual-coding, static-media presentations, low-interest extraneous details, testing, and spacing; there was, however, weak endorsement of the strategy of generating one's own study materials. In addition, an independent measure of metacognitive self-regulation was correlated with scenario performance. Study 2 demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for students who had received targeted instruction on applied memory topics in their psychology courses, and the best performance for those students directly exposed to the original empirical studies from which the scenarios were derived. In sum, this research suggests that undergraduates are largely unaware of several specific strategies that could benefit memory for course information; further, training in applied learning and memory topics has the potential to improve metacognitive judgments in these domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Canada 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 373 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 9%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 74 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 34%
Social Sciences 73 19%
Linguistics 13 3%
Computer Science 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 85 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,157,636
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#80
of 1,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,338
of 92,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.