You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The potential of medical device industry in technological and economical context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s88574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra Maresova, Marek Penhaker, Ali Selamat, Kamil Kuca |
| Abstract |
The high quality of public health improves not only healthy life expectancy, but also the productivity of labor. The most important part of the health care sector is the medical technology industry. The aim of this study is to analyze the current situation in the medical device industry in Europe, its potential strengths and weaknesses in the context of topical economic and demographic development. The contribution specifies an analysis of the economic state of the medical device industry in the context of demographic development of European Union's macroeconomic indicators and views of experts in the field of medical device development, concerning the opportunities for entities involved in the medical device market. There is fierce competition on the European market. The innovative activity is stable and well regulated by responsible authorities. Worldwide, the medical device market is expected to grow. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#346
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,804
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.