↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Environmentally Persistent Escherichia coli Isolates Leached from an Irish Soil▿

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of Environmentally Persistent Escherichia coli Isolates Leached from an Irish Soil▿
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2010
DOI 10.1128/aem.01944-09
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona P. Brennan, Florence Abram, Fabio A. Chinalia, Karl G. Richards, Vincent O'Flaherty

Abstract

Soils are typically considered to be suboptimal environments for enteric organisms, but there is increasing evidence that Escherichia coli populations can become resident in soil under favorable conditions. Previous work reported the growth of autochthonous E. coli in a maritime temperate Luvic Stagnosol soil, and this study aimed to characterize, by molecular and physiological means, the genetic diversity and physiology of environmentally persistent E. coli isolates leached from the soil. Molecular analysis (16S rRNA sequencing, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and a multiplex PCR method) established the genetic diversity of the isolates (n = 7), while physiological methods determined the metabolic capability and environmental fitness of the isolates, relative to those of laboratory strains, under the conditions tested. Genotypic analysis indicated that the leached isolates do not form a single genetic grouping but that multiple genotypic groups are capable of surviving and proliferating in this environment. In physiological studies, environmental isolates grew well across a broad range of temperatures and media, in comparison with the growth of laboratory strains. These findings suggest that certain E. coli strains may have the ability to colonize and adapt to soil conditions. The resulting lack of fecal specificity has implications for the use of E. coli as an indicator of fecal pollution in the environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 37%
Environmental Science 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#17,702
of 19,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,067
of 174,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#96
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.