You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalência de transtornos mentais comuns e fatores associados entre idosos de um município do Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232018232.12852016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paloma Alves dos Santos da Silva, Saulo Vasconcelos Rocha, Loiamara Barreto Santos, Clarice Alves dos Santos, Camila Rego Amorim, Alba Benemérita Alves Vilela |
| Abstract |
With advancing age, the presence of psychic morbidities is more frequent and jeopardizes the quality of life of the population. The scope of this study was to estimate the prevalence and factors associated with Common Mental Disorders (CMD) in the elderly population resident in a municipality. It involved a cross-sectional study with 310 elderly people residing in Ibicuí in the State of Bahia. A questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, health status and screening for CMD (Self-Reporting Questionnaire - SRQ-20) was used. For statistical analysis, Poisson regression was used, with calculation of prevalence ratios, confidence intervals (95%) and p ≤ 0.05 significance level. The general prevalence of CMD was 55.8%. The female individuals who reported rheumatism presented higher prevalence of CMD. It is recommended that prevention and control of these morbidities among the elderly population of the municipality should be implemented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,250
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,016
of 1,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,890
of 440,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.