You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distinct Roles of MicroRNA-1 and -499 in Ventricular Specification and Functional Maturation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0027417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-Dong Fu, Stephanie N. Rushing, Deborah K. Lieu, Camie W. Chan, Chi-Wing Kong, Lin Geng, Kitchener D. Wilson, Nipavan Chiamvimonvat, Kenneth R. Boheler, Joseph C. Wu, Gordon Keller, Roger J. Hajjar, Ronald A. Li |
| Abstract |
MicroRNAs (miRs) negatively regulate transcription and are important determinants of normal heart development and heart failure pathogenesis. Despite the significant knowledge gained in mouse studies, their functional roles in human (h) heart remain elusive. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 26% |
| Researcher | 37 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 18% |
| Engineering | 11 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2011.
All research outputs
#17,651,093
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,144
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,588
of 125,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,052
of 2,611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.