↓ Skip to main content

Examination of multiple working hypotheses to address reproductive failure in reintroduced Whooping Cranes

Overview of attention for article published in Condor, The, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examination of multiple working hypotheses to address reproductive failure in reintroduced Whooping Cranes
Published in
Condor, The, August 2018
DOI 10.1650/condor-17-263.1
Authors

Jeb A. Barzen, Sarah J. Converse, Peter H. Adler, Anne Lacy, Elmer Gray, Andrew Gossens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 46%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,300,618
of 14,747,541 outputs
Outputs from Condor, The
#67
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,406
of 275,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Condor, The
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,747,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.