You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lactate kinetics in sepsis and septic shock: a review of the literature and rationale for further research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-015-0105-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jason Chertoff, Michael Chisum, Bryan Garcia, Jorge Lascano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Costa Rica | 2 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Romania | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 21% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Researcher | 14 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 28 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 63% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,892,374
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#92
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,077
of 292,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.