↓ Skip to main content

Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
186 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
452 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
764 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1800042115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel S. Karp, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Timothy D. Meehan, Emily A. Martin, Fabrice DeClerck, Heather Grab, Claudio Gratton, Lauren Hunt, Ashley E. Larsen, Alejandra Martínez-Salinas, Megan E. O’Rourke, Adrien Rusch, Katja Poveda, Mattias Jonsson, Jay A. Rosenheim, Nancy A. Schellhorn, Teja Tscharntke, Stephen D. Wratten, Wei Zhang, Aaron L. Iverson, Lynn S. Adler, Matthias Albrecht, Audrey Alignier, Gina M. Angelella, Muhammad Zubair Anjum, Jacques Avelino, Péter Batáry, Johannes M. Baveco, Felix J. J. A. Bianchi, Klaus Birkhofer, Eric W. Bohnenblust, Riccardo Bommarco, Michael J. Brewer, Berta Caballero-López, Yves Carrière, Luísa G. Carvalheiro, Luis Cayuela, Mary Centrella, Aleksandar Ćetković, Dominic Charles Henri, Ariane Chabert, Alejandro C. Costamagna, Aldo De la Mora, Joop de Kraker, Nicolas Desneux, Eva Diehl, Tim Diekötter, Carsten F. Dormann, James O. Eckberg, Martin H. Entling, Daniela Fiedler, Pierre Franck, F. J. Frank van Veen, Thomas Frank, Vesna Gagic, Michael P. D. Garratt, Awraris Getachew, David J. Gonthier, Peter B. Goodell, Ignazio Graziosi, Russell L. Groves, Geoff M. Gurr, Zachary Hajian-Forooshani, George E. Heimpel, John D. Herrmann, Anders S. Huseth, Diego J. Inclán, Adam J. Ingrao, Phirun Iv, Katja Jacot, Gregg A. Johnson, Laura Jones, Marina Kaiser, Joe M. Kaser, Tamar Keasar, Tania N. Kim, Miriam Kishinevsky, Douglas A. Landis, Blas Lavandero, Claire Lavigne, Anne Le Ralec, Debissa Lemessa, Deborah K. Letourneau, Heidi Liere, Yanhui Lu, Yael Lubin, Tim Luttermoser, Bea Maas, Kevi Mace, Filipe Madeira, Viktoria Mader, Anne Marie Cortesero, Lorenzo Marini, Eliana Martinez, Holly M. Martinson, Philippe Menozzi, Matthew G. E. Mitchell, Tadashi Miyashita, Gonzalo A. R. Molina, Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, Matthew E. O’Neal, Itai Opatovsky, Sebaastian Ortiz-Martinez, Michael Nash, Örjan Östman, Annie Ouin, Damie Pak, Daniel Paredes, Soroush Parsa, Hazel Parry, Ricardo Perez-Alvarez, David J. Perović, Julie A. Peterson, Sandrine Petit, Stacy M. Philpott, Manuel Plantegenest, Milan Plećaš, Therese Pluess, Xavier Pons, Simon G. Potts, Richard F. Pywell, David W. Ragsdale, Tatyana A. Rand, Lucie Raymond, Benoît Ricci, Chris Sargent, Jean-Pierre Sarthou, Julia Saulais, Jessica Schäckermann, Nick P. Schmidt, Gudrun Schneider, Christof Schüepp, Frances S. Sivakoff, Henrik G. Smith, Kaitlin Stack Whitney, Sonja Stutz, Zsofia Szendrei, Mayura B. Takada, Hisatomo Taki, Giovanni Tamburini, Linda J. Thomson, Yann Tricault, Noelline Tsafack, Matthias Tschumi, Muriel Valantin-Morison, Mai Van Trinh, Wopke van der Werf, Kerri T. Vierling, Ben P. Werling, Jennifer B. Wickens, Victoria J. Wickens, Ben A. Woodcock, Kris Wyckhuys, Haijun Xiao, Mika Yasuda, Akira Yoshioka, Yi Zou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 764 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 764 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 151 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 18%
Student > Master 91 12%
Student > Bachelor 61 8%
Other 38 5%
Other 106 14%
Unknown 180 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 336 44%
Environmental Science 94 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 2%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Engineering 11 1%
Other 58 8%
Unknown 234 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#214,058
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,022
of 103,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,351
of 343,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#72
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.