↓ Skip to main content

Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003642.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Mei Zhang, Weiya Wang, Sameline Grimsgaard

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Unspecified 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 53%
Unspecified 21 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 16 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,485,513
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,683
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,391
of 249,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.