↓ Skip to main content

Infant Pupil Diameter Changes in Response to Others' Positive and Negative Emotions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infant Pupil Diameter Changes in Response to Others' Positive and Negative Emotions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Geangu, Petra Hauf, Rishi Bhardwaj, Wolfram Bentz

Abstract

It has been suggested that infants resonate emotionally to others' positive and negative affect displays, and that these responses become stronger towards emotions with negative valence around the age of 12-months. In this study we measured 6- and 12-month-old infants' changes in pupil diameter when presented with the image and sound of peers experiencing happiness, distress and an emotionally neutral state. For all participants the perception of another's distress triggered larger pupil diameters. Perceiving other's happiness also induced larger pupil diameters but for shorter time intervals. Importantly, we also found evidence for an asymmetry in autonomous arousal towards positive versus negative emotional displays. Larger pupil sizes for another's distress compared to another's happiness were recorded shortly after stimulus onset for the older infants, and in a later time window for the 6-month-olds. These findings suggest that arousal responses for negative as well as for positive emotions are present in the second half of the first postnatal year. Importantly, an asymmetry with stronger responses for negative emotions seems to be already present at this age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 240 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 20%
Student > Bachelor 42 16%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 154 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 43 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,747,395
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,289
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,411
of 125,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#879
of 2,611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.