↓ Skip to main content

No Strategy Can Win in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Linking Game Theory and Computer Simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No Strategy Can Win in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Linking Game Theory and Computer Simulations
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2018.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julián García, Matthijs van Veelen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,768,998
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#172
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,597
of 346,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.