You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoidance of unconventional oil wells and roads exacerbates habitat loss for grassland birds in the North American great plains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.040 |
| Authors |
Sarah J. Thompson, Douglas H. Johnson, Neal D. Niemuth, Christine A. Ribic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 27% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 28% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,267,163
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,793
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,755
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#46
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.