↓ Skip to main content

Avoidance of unconventional oil wells and roads exacerbates habitat loss for grassland birds in the North American great plains

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avoidance of unconventional oil wells and roads exacerbates habitat loss for grassland birds in the North American great plains
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.040
Authors

Sarah J. Thompson, Douglas H. Johnson, Neal D. Niemuth, Christine A. Ribic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 31%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 41%
Environmental Science 29 31%
Engineering 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,403,595
of 17,523,007 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,215
of 5,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,262
of 259,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#31
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,523,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.