↓ Skip to main content

Bromo–nitro substitution on a tertiary α carbon—a previously uncharacterized facet of the Kornblum substitution

Overview of attention for article published in RSC Advances, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Bromo–nitro substitution on a tertiary α carbon—a previously uncharacterized facet of the Kornblum substitution
Published in
RSC Advances, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5ra14798k
Authors

Matthew J. Leonard, Peter G. McKay, Anthony R. Lingham

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,409,638
of 6,241,002 outputs
Outputs from RSC Advances
#204
of 2,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,200
of 194,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RSC Advances
#17
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,241,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.