You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature15374 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Forest Isbell, Dylan Craven, John Connolly, Michel Loreau, Bernhard Schmid, Carl Beierkuhnlein, T. Martijn Bezemer, Catherine Bonin, Helge Bruelheide, Enrica de Luca, Anne Ebeling, John N. Griffin, Qinfeng Guo, Yann Hautier, Andy Hector, Anke Jentsch, Jürgen Kreyling, Vojtěch Lanta, Pete Manning, Sebastian T. Meyer, Akira S. Mori, Shahid Naeem, Pascal A. Niklaus, H. Wayne Polley, Peter B. Reich, Christiane Roscher, Eric W. Seabloom, Melinda D. Smith, Madhav P. Thakur, David Tilman, Benjamin F. Tracy, Wim H. van der Putten, Jasper van Ruijven, Alexandra Weigelt, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Brian Wilsey, Nico Eisenhauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 9% |
| Canada | 11 | 4% |
| Australia | 10 | 4% |
| Japan | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 124 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 205 | 72% |
| Scientists | 69 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 7 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2316 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 471 | 20% |
| Researcher | 414 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 348 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 228 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 119 | 5% |
| Other | 370 | 15% |
| Unknown | 448 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 845 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 631 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 96 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 1% |
| Other | 145 | 6% |
| Unknown | 598 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 333. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#103,438
of 26,104,555 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,054
of 99,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,253
of 292,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#156
of 1,091 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,104,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,091 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.