↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Structural and functional analytics for community detection in large-scale complex networks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Structural and functional analytics for community detection in large-scale complex networks
Published in
Journal of Big Data, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40537-015-0026-z
Authors

Pravin Chopade, Justin Zhan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,615,653
of 6,241,002 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#38
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,208
of 194,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,241,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.