You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exercise in prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression among children and young people
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004691.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lillebeth Larun, Lena V. Nordheim, Eilin Ekeland, Kåre Birger Hagen, Frode Heian |
Abstract |
Depression and anxiety are common psychological disorders for children and adolescents. Psychological (e.g. psychotherapy), psychosocial (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy) and biological (e.g. SSRIs or tricyclic drugs) treatments are the most common treatments being offered. The large variety of therapeutic interventions give rise to questions of clinical effectiveness and side effects. Physical exercise is inexpensive with few, if any, side effects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 42% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 922 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
United States | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 905 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 155 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 127 | 14% |
Researcher | 93 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 64 | 7% |
Other | 167 | 18% |
Unknown | 233 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 203 | 22% |
Psychology | 138 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 77 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 48 | 5% |
Other | 122 | 13% |
Unknown | 259 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,491,095
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,177
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,633
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.