Title |
Clinical and pathological significance of ROS1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-015-1737-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kyung-Hun Lee, Kyoung-Bun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Sae-Won Han, Do-Youn Oh, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh, Ja-June Jang, Yung-Jue Bang |
Abstract |
More knowledge about genetic and molecular features of cholangiocarcinoma is needed to develop effective therapeutic strategies. We investigated the clinical and pathological significance of ROS1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. One hundred ninety-four patients with curatively resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included in this study. Tumor tissue specimens were collected and analyzed for ROS1 gene rearrangement using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and ROS1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). ROS1 immunohistochemistry was positive (moderate or strong staining) in 72 tumors (37.1 %). ROS1 protein expression was significantly correlated with well differentiated tumors, papillary or mucinous histology, oncocytic/hepatoid or intestinal type tumors, and periductal infiltrating or intraductal growing tumors (vs. mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma). ROS-expressing tumors were associated with better disease-free survival (30.1 months for ROS1 expression (+) tumors vs. 9.0 months for ROS1 (-) tumors, p = 0.006). Moreover, ROS1 expression was an independent predictor of better disease-free survival in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.607, 95 % CI 0.377-0.976; p = 0.039). Although break-apart FISH was successfully performed in 102 samples, a split pattern indicative of ROS1 gene rearrangement was not found in the examined samples. ROS1 protein expression was associated with well-differentiated histology and better survival in our patients with resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. ROS1 gene rearrangement by break-apart FISH was not found in the examined samples. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |