You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facilitators and Barriers to Adopting Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Contextualizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine BenMessaoud, Hadi Kharrazi, Karl F. MacDorman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 43 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 37 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 66 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#790,201
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,438
of 223,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,518
of 195,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 1,267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.