↓ Skip to main content

Do No Harm.

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
105 X users

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do No Harm.
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2018
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2018.774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy A Brader

Abstract

After a goals-of-care conversation, this patient's chart listed his status as "full-code." As shown in this image, resuscitation was initiated for a 92-year-old man with metastatic malignancy after being found pulseless by the rounding team.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 284 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Researcher 30 10%
Other 24 8%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 58 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 59 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 19%
Psychology 27 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Arts and Humanities 15 5%
Other 59 20%
Unknown 65 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#590,156
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#142
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,151
of 345,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.