↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness of chronic asthma management and medication adherence in patients visiting ambulatory clinic of Gondar University Hospital: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appropriateness of chronic asthma management and medication adherence in patients visiting ambulatory clinic of Gondar University Hospital: a cross-sectional study
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40413-018-0196-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zelalem Tilahun Tesfaye, Nebeyu Tsegu Gebreselase, Boressa Adugna Horsa

Abstract

Although asthma cannot be cured, appropriate management can ensure adequate control of the disease, prevent disease progression and even reverse the illness, enabling people to enjoy good quality of life. Predisposing factors for inappropriate asthma management, including limited diagnostic options and inadequate supply of medications, are features of health institutions in developing countries like Ethiopia. This study was launched to determine the appropriateness of asthma management in patients visiting ambulatory clinic of the Gondar University Hospital. Cross-sectional study was conducted on asthmatic patients who were on chronic follow-up at Gondar University Hospital. Data were collected by review of patients' medical records and through a semi-structured questionnaire. The Global Initiative for Asthma guideline was used as a reference for determining the  appropriateness of asthma management whereas the eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8) was used to collect data on patients' adherence to asthma medications. The study participants' ages ranged from 20 to 80 years with a mean age of 49.3 ± 13.6 years. Mild asthma showed a slight predominance in frequency accounting for 38.7% of cases. Asthma management was found to be inappropriate in 52.0% of the patients. Inappropriateness of therapy is attributed to incorrect dosing of medications, addition of unnecessary medications and omission of necessary medications. Patients who had moderate asthma were more likely to receive appropriate treatment [AOR = 728: 63.2, 8386.06], whereas having a treatment regimen of beclomethasone with salbutamol was found to be predictor of inappropriate treatment [AOR = 0.004: 0.001, 0.07]. More than half (56.7%) of the study subjects reported to have high adherence to their medications. Having no formal education was a predictor of low adherence to asthma medications [AOR = 0.051: 0.003, 0.978] whereas, increased monthly income was found to have a positive association with adherence [AOR = 1.923: 1.037, 3.566]. High prevalence of inappropriate therapy in this study may be attributed primarily to limited accessibility of asthma medications, as 86% of the patients received medium dose beclomethasone with salbutamol for exacerbations despite being at different severity of asthma and level of control. The findings of the study showed more than half of asthmatic patients received inappropriate treatment. Nevertheless, a larger proportion of the patients claimed to be highly adherent to their medications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 47 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 53 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,574,797
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#386
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,985
of 341,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.