↓ Skip to main content

Delayed Learning Effects with Erroneous Examples: a Study of Learning Decimals with a Web-Based Tutor

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delayed Learning Effects with Erroneous Examples: a Study of Learning Decimals with a Web-Based Tutor
Published in
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40593-015-0064-x
Authors

Bruce M. McLaren, Deanne M. Adams, Richard E. Mayer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 17%
Computer Science 16 17%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Mathematics 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,032,881
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
#88
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,283
of 292,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.