↓ Skip to main content

Clinical risk conditions for acute lung injury in the intensive care unit and hospital ward: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical risk conditions for acute lung injury in the intensive care unit and hospital ward: a prospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc6113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niall D Ferguson, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Andrés Esteban, Federico Gordo, Teresa Honrubia, Oscar Peñuelas, Alejandro Algora, Gema García, Alejandra Bustos, Inmaculada Rodríguez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 20 31%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,966,838
of 6,311,249 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,111
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,118
of 198,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#117
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,311,249 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.