↓ Skip to main content

Histone H3 Mutations in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmacology Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 120)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histone H3 Mutations in Cancer
Published in
Current Pharmacology Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40495-018-0141-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Ching Esther Wan, Jiaxian Liu, Kui Ming Chan

Abstract

Histone modifications are one form of epigenetic information that relate closely to gene regulation. Aberrant histone methylation caused by alteration in chromatin-modifying enzymes has long been implicated in cancers. More recently, recurrent histone mutations have been identified in multiple cancers and have been shown to impede histone methylation. All three histone mutations (H3K27M, H3K36M, and H3G34V/R) identified result in amino acid substitution at/near a lysine residue that is a target of methylation. In the cases of H3K27M and H3K36M, found in pediatric DIPG (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma) and chondroblastoma respectively, expression of the mutant histone leads to global reduction of histone methylation at the respective lysine residue. These mutant histones are termed "oncohistones" because their expression reprograms the epigenome and shapes an oncogenic transcriptome. Dissecting the mechanism of H3K27M-driven oncogenesis has led to the discovery of promising therapeutic targets in pediatric DIPG. The purpose of this review is to summarize the work done on identifying and dissecting the oncogenic properties of histone H3 mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 45 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 45 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,283,212
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmacology Reports
#30
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,143
of 327,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmacology Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them