↓ Skip to main content

EGFR T790M detection and osimertinib treatment response evaluation by liquid biopsy in lung adenocarcinoma patients with acquired resistance to first generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EGFR T790M detection and osimertinib treatment response evaluation by liquid biopsy in lung adenocarcinoma patients with acquired resistance to first generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13000-018-0728-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenguang Li, Rui Jia, Hailin Liu, Bin Zhang, Changli Wang

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR activating mutations will inevitably acquire resistance to first generation TKIs. Acquired EGFR T790M mutation causes about 50% of these resistance cases. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and cobas enables quantification of T790M mutation. Whether these methods can predict clinical response of osimertinib treatment is unknown. Tumor and blood samples from 69 stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI were collected. Cobas® Mutation Test v2 kit was used to detect EGFR mutations in FFPE or plasma samples. Plasma T790M mutation of both osimertinib naïve and treated patients were quantified by Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). T790M mutation rate detected by FFPE tissue cobas, plasma ctDNA cobas and plasma ctDNA ddPCR test were 54.5, 21.3 and 30.4% respectively. The T790M positive rate was 52.2% considering all testing methods. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60.9% in 23 patients received osimertinib treatment. Quantification of T790M after treatment decreased to very low level, but no association was observed between clinical response and T790M mutation level decrease. ddPCR is more sensitive in plama ctDNA testing and should be performed even in tumor tissue T790M test negative cases. EGFR T790M mutation level is not associated with clinical response after osimertinib treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,830,418
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#182
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,386
of 330,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.