↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility study of docetaxel plus bevacizumab as first line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 1014

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility study of docetaxel plus bevacizumab as first line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 1014
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1756-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Takagi, Yukio Hosomi, Fumihiro Oshita, Hiroaki Okamoto, Nobuhiko Seki, Koichi Minato, Hiromi Aono, Kouzo Yamada, Yusuke Okuma, Naoya Hida, Takahiko Sakamoto, Yosuke Miura, Makiko Yomota, Akira Satoh, Hideo Kunitoh, Kentaro Sakamaki, Masahiko Shibuya, Koshiro Watanabe

Abstract

Docetaxel monotherapy is one of the standard treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients. The addition of bevacizumab to docetaxel seems promising; however, the feasibility of this combination has not been investigated in such patients. Patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer aged 70 years or older who had not previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients in the Level 0 cohort received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, whereas those in the Level-1 cohort received docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Chemotherapy was repeated 3 weekly for six cycles. The primary endpoint was toxicity and the secondary endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and proportion of patients who underwent three or more cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients were enrolled from December 2010 to September 2012 at six institutes. Of the nine patients enrolled in Level 0, two experienced dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia and prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia in one patient, and Grade 3 infection in another patient) during the first cycle. Enrollment to the Level 0 cohort was terminated because two patients developed Grade 4 sepsis during later cycles. The remaining 12 patients were enrolled in the Level-1 cohort, in which two dose-limiting toxicities (prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia and Grade 3 increased aminotransferase level) were observed. No patient in the Level-1 cohort experienced Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 89 % of Level 0 patients and 50 % of Level-1 patients. The proportion of patients who experienced Grade 3/4 infection, febrile neutropenia or sepsis was 44 % in the Level 0 cohort, and 8 % in the Level-1 cohort. The overall response rate to chemotherapy and progression-free survival were 29 % (95 % CI, 11-52 %) and 5.9 months (95 % CI, 3.6-9.1 months), respectively. Efficacy outcomes did not differ significantly between the cohorts. Toxicities were tolerable in level-1 cohort. The recommended dose of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab for elderly patients was determined as 50 mg/m(2) of docetaxel and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab and toxicities were tolerable. Further studies are warranted. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004240 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,496
of 8,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,871
of 283,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#179
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.