↓ Skip to main content

Identifying mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections from whole genome sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections from whole genome sequence data
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4988-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Sobkowiak, Judith R. Glynn, Rein M. G. J. Houben, Kim Mallard, Jody E. Phelan, José Afonso Guerra-Assunção, Louis Banda, Themba Mzembe, Miguel Viveiros, Ruth McNerney, Julian Parkhill, Amelia C. Crampin, Taane G. Clark

Abstract

Mixed, polyclonal Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection occurs in natural populations. Developing an effective method for detecting such cases is important in measuring the success of treatment and reconstruction of transmission between patients. Using whole genome sequence (WGS) data, we assess two methods for detecting mixed infection: (i) a combination of the number of heterozygous sites and the proportion of heterozygous sites to total SNPs, and (ii) Bayesian model-based clustering of allele frequencies from sequencing reads at heterozygous sites. In silico and in vitro artificially mixed and known pure M. tuberculosis samples were analysed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of each method. We found that both approaches were effective in distinguishing between pure strains and mixed infection where there was relatively high (> 10%) proportion of a minor strain in the mixture. A large dataset of clinical isolates (n = 1963) from the Karonga Prevention Study in Northern Malawi was tested to examine correlations with patient characteristics and outcomes with mixed infection. The frequency of mixed infection in the population was found to be around 10%, with an association with year of diagnosis, but no association with age, sex, HIV status or previous tuberculosis. Mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection was identified in silico using whole genome sequence data. The methods presented here can be applied to population-wide analyses of tuberculosis to estimate the frequency of mixed infection, and to identify individual cases of mixed infections. These cases are important when considering the evolution and transmission of the disease, and in patient treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,772,804
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#422
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,265
of 332,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#12
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.