↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation on Pressure Difference of Pulmonary Valve Stenosis in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot After Repair

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation on Pressure Difference of Pulmonary Valve Stenosis in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot After Repair
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1947-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichiro Sakaki, Tomoaki Murakami, Masahiro Shiraishi, Mamoru Yamamoto

Abstract

Pressure difference (PD) is an important parameter in evaluating the degree of stenotic lesion. However, PD is influenced by the blood flow volume passing through the stenosis. In patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), pulmonary valve regurgitation (PR) and pulmonary valve stenosis (vPS) are common post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of PR on the PD. First, we examined the relationship between the peak-to-peak PD and the valve orifice area in 7 patients with vPS from their cardiac catheterization data. Second, an estimated PD, i.e., PD assuming no PR, was calculated in 8 patients with TOF with vPS and PR from their valve orifice area using the relational equation in patients with vPS. Moreover, an excess of PD, equating to the difference between the measured and estimated PD, was calculated. Finally, the relationship between the regurgitant fraction (RF) and the excess PD was analyzed. There was a strong relationship between the reciprocal of the valve orifice area and the PD in patients with vPS (r = 0.904, p = 0.0053). The excess PD showed a significant correlation with the RF in patients with TOF (r = 0.889, p = 0.0032). PR of over 25% in RF augmented the PD depending on the regurgitant volume. Severity of vPS could be overestimated in post-operative patients with TOF who had significant PR when their RF was above 25%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,647,094
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#867
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,515
of 330,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.