↓ Skip to main content

Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Orco

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Orco
Published in
Nature, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0420-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel A. Butterwick, Josefina del Mármol, Kelly H. Kim, Martha A. Kahlson, Jackson A. Rogow, Thomas Walz, Vanessa Ruta

Abstract

The olfactory system must recognize and discriminate amongst an enormous variety of chemicals in the environment. To contend with such diversity, insects have evolved a family of odorant-gated ion channels comprised of a highly conserved co-receptor (Orco) and a divergent odorant receptor (OR) that confers chemical specificity. Here, we present the single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structure of an Orco homomer from the parasitic fig wasp Apocrypta bakeri at 3.5 Å resolution, providing structural insight into this receptor family. Orco possesses a novel channel architecture, with four subunits symmetrically arranged around a central pore that diverges into four lateral conduits that open to the cytosol. The Orco tetramer has few inter-subunit interactions within the membrane and is bound together by a small cytoplasmic anchor domain. The minimal sequence conservation among ORs maps largely to the pore and anchor domain, shedding light on how the architecture of this receptor family accommodates its remarkable sequence diversity and facilitates the evolution of odour tuning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 357 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 19%
Researcher 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Master 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 94 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 22%
Neuroscience 44 12%
Chemistry 16 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 95 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#246,118
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,001
of 98,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,063
of 341,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#313
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.