↓ Skip to main content

Energetic Optimisation of Foraging Honeybees: Flexible Change of Strategies in Response to Environmental Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Energetic Optimisation of Foraging Honeybees: Flexible Change of Strategies in Response to Environmental Challenges
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0105432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Stabentheiner, Helmut Kovac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 36%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#155,030
of 194,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,552
of 236,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,587
of 4,931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.