↓ Skip to main content

Local structure in deeply supercooled liquids exhibits growing lengthscales and dynamical correlations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local structure in deeply supercooled liquids exhibits growing lengthscales and dynamical correlations
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05371-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Hallett, Francesco Turci, C. Patrick Royall

Abstract

Glasses are among the most widely used of everyday materials, yet the process by which a liquid's viscosity increases by 14 decades to become a glass remains unclear, as often contradictory theories provide equally good descriptions of the available data. Knowledge of emergent lengthscales and higher-order structure could help resolve this, but this requires time-resolved measurements of dense particle coordinates-previously only obtained over a limited time interval. Here we present an experimental study of a model colloidal system over a dynamic window significantly larger than previous measurements, revealing structural ordering more strongly linked to dynamics than previously found. Furthermore we find that immobile regions and domains of local structure grow concurrently with density, and that these regions have low configurational entropy. We thus show that local structure plays an important role at deep supercooling, consistent with a thermodynamic interpretation of the glass transition rather than a principally dynamic description.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 24 26%
Materials Science 15 16%
Chemistry 13 14%
Chemical Engineering 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,240,127
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#38,660
of 57,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,440
of 325,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#962
of 1,370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.