↓ Skip to main content

Novas faces da história da medicina na América Latina

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novas faces da história da medicina na América Latina
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702006000100013
Authors

Claudio Bertolli Filho

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,112,813
of 6,391,435 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#126
of 700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,837
of 197,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,391,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 700 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.