↓ Skip to main content

Bird Diversity, Birdwatching Tourism and Conservation in Peru: A Geographic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bird Diversity, Birdwatching Tourism and Conservation in Peru: A Geographic Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liisa Puhakka, Matti Salo, Ilari E. Sääksjärvi

Abstract

In the face of the continuing global biodiversity loss, it is important not only to assess the need for conservation, through e.g. gap analyses, but also to seek practical solutions for protecting biodiversity. Environmentally and socially sustainable tourism can be one such solution. We present a method to spatially link data on conservation needs and tourism-based economic opportunities, using bird-related tourism in Peru as an example. Our analysis highlighted areas in Peru where potential for such projects could be particularly high. Several areas within the central and northern Andean regions, as well as within the lowland Amazonian regions of Madre de Dios and Loreto emerge as promising for this type of activity. Mechanisms to implement conservation in these areas include e.g. conservation and ecotourism concessions, private conservation areas, and conservation easements. Some of these mechanisms also offer opportunities for local communities seeking to secure their traditional land ownership and use rights. (Spanish language abstract, Abstract S1).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Peru 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 216 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Other 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 56 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 31%
Environmental Science 49 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 5%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,845,290
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,924
of 193,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,406
of 239,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#728
of 2,704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.