↓ Skip to main content

Impact of insecticide-treated nets on wild pyrethroid resistant Anopheles epiroticus population from southern Vietnam tested in experimental huts

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of insecticide-treated nets on wild pyrethroid resistant Anopheles epiroticus population from southern Vietnam tested in experimental huts
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wim Van Bortel, Vu Duc Chinh, Dirk Berkvens, Niko Speybroeck, Ho Dinh Trung, Marc Coosemans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 14 17%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,453
of 5,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,977
of 94,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.