↓ Skip to main content

Impact of insecticide-treated nets on wild pyrethroid resistant Anopheles epiroticus population from southern Vietnam tested in experimental huts

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of insecticide-treated nets on wild pyrethroid resistant Anopheles epiroticus population from southern Vietnam tested in experimental huts
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wim Van Bortel, Vu Duc Chinh, Dirk Berkvens, Niko Speybroeck, Ho Dinh Trung, Marc Coosemans

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 13 18%
Lecturer 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Environmental Science 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,603,614
of 12,440,051 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,393
of 3,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,714
of 271,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#98
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.