You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of health care service delivery interventions in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Health Research and Policy, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41256-018-0073-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel I. Watson, Harvir Sahota, Celia A. Taylor, Yen-Fu Chen, Richard J. Lilford |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,775,964
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Research and Policy
#63
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,234
of 328,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Research and Policy
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.