↓ Skip to main content

Imaging the coordination of multiple signalling activities in living cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging the coordination of multiple signalling activities in living cells
Published in
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nrm3212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Welch, Hunter Elliott, Gaudenz Danuser, Klaus M. Hahn

Abstract

Cellular signal transduction occurs in complex and redundant interaction networks, which are best understood by simultaneously monitoring the activation dynamics of multiple components. Recent advances in biosensor technology have made it possible to visualize and quantify the activation of multiple network nodes in the same living cell. The precision and scope of this approach has been greatly extended by novel computational approaches (referred to as computational multiplexing) that can reveal relationships between network nodes imaged in separate cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 292 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 9%
Professor 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 4%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 16%
Chemistry 23 7%
Physics and Astronomy 17 5%
Engineering 17 5%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 30 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,969,152
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#1,318
of 2,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,957
of 140,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.