You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arthrobacter paludis sp. nov., isolated from a marsh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1099/ijsem.0.002426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qi Zhang, Mihee Oh, Jong-Hwa Kim, Rungravee Kanjanasuntree, Maytiya Konkit, Ampaitip Sukhoom, Duangporn Kantachote, Wonyong Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#4,027
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,422
of 340,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#80
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.