↓ Skip to main content

Packet-based communication in the cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
61 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Packet-based communication in the cortex
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nrn4026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artur Luczak, Bruce L. McNaughton, Kenneth D. Harris

Abstract

Cortical circuits work through the generation of coordinated, large-scale activity patterns. In sensory systems, the onset of a discrete stimulus usually evokes a temporally organized packet of population activity lasting ∼50-200 ms. The structure of these packets is partially stereotypical, and variation in the exact timing and number of spikes within a packet conveys information about the identity of the stimulus. Similar packets also occur during ongoing stimuli and spontaneously. We suggest that such packets constitute the basic building blocks of cortical coding.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 10%
United Kingdom 8 3%
Germany 6 2%
France 6 2%
Japan 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 202 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 32%
Researcher 77 30%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Professor 15 6%
Other 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 35%
Neuroscience 84 32%
Computer Science 20 8%
Psychology 18 7%
Engineering 13 5%
Other 34 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#228,956
of 8,402,655 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#146
of 1,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,245
of 245,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,402,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.