You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Organizing a Virtual Conference—Anywhere
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelson N. Gichora, Segun A. Fatumo, Mtakai V. Ngara, Noura Chelbat, Kavisha Ramdayal, Kenneth B. Opap, Geoffrey H. Siwo, Marion O. Adebiyi, Amina El Gonnouni, Denis Zofou, Amal A. M. Maurady, Ezekiel F. Adebiyi, Etienne P. de Villiers, Daniel K. Masiga, Jeffrey W. Bizzaro, Prashanth Suravajhala, Sheila C. Ommeh, Winston Hide |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 183 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,784,799
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,489
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,426
of 102,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.