You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Emergency and permanence of the Zika virus epidemic: an agenda connecting research and policy
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, August 2018
Martha Cristina Nunes Moreira, Marcos Nascimento, Corina Helena Figueira Mendes, Marcia Pinto, Sandra Valongueiro, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Tereza Maciel Lyra, Hannah Kuper
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||11||21%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||9||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||6||12%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 333,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.