You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving conservation policy with genomics: a guide to integrating adaptive potential into U.S. Endangered Species Act decisions for conservation practitioners and geneticists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1096-1 |
| Authors |
W. C. Funk, Brenna R. Forester, Sarah J. Converse, Catherine Darst, Steve Morey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 40% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 42 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 22 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 18% |
| Researcher | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 124 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 54 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#847,320
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#35
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,937
of 340,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.