You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Humans best judge how much to cooperate when facing hard problems in large groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-41773-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Guazzini, Federica Stefanelli, Enrico Imbimbo, Daniele Vilone, Franco Bagnoli, Zoran Levnajić |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 35% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,471,691
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#34,889
of 136,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,842
of 357,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,183
of 4,028 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,028 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.