↓ Skip to main content

Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010720.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul V Beirne, Sarah Hennessy, Sharon L Cadogan, Frances Shiely, Tony Fitzgerald, Fiona MacLeod

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 343 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 15 4%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 116 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 16%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 129 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,741,920
of 22,510,821 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,413
of 12,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,769
of 302,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,510,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.