↓ Skip to main content

The surgical experience of current non-surgeons gained at medical school: a survey analysis with implications for teaching today’s students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The surgical experience of current non-surgeons gained at medical school: a survey analysis with implications for teaching today’s students
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0466-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Zundel, Adrian Meder, Stephan Zipfel, Anne Herrmann-Werner

Abstract

It is unknown what aspects of undergraduate surgical curricula are useful for future non-surgeons. We aimed to define relevant, enduring learning achievements for this subgroup to enable student-centered teaching. An online questionnaire using open ended questions was distributed to physicians of non-surgical specialties at the University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany and its associated teaching hospitals. Participants were asked to describe knowledge and skills that endured from their surgical clerkship and which of these are used in daily practice. Textual responses were initially coded using content analysis and the frequency of recurrent categories was calculated. Sixty-seven of 153 questionnaires were returned; participants belonged to six different non-surgical specialties and had received their training at 22 different medical schools. Sustaining learning achievements included basic skills (suturing and working under sterile conditions), learning about professionalism and appreciating working conditions in surgery. Two learning techniques were valued: witnessing of rare cases or complications and working autonomously. Integration of our findings in undergraduate surgical teaching may focus teaching on students' interests and improve surgical teaching.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 26%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,099
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,142
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,654
of 284,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#56
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.