↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled nitric oxide as adjunctive therapy for severe malaria: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled nitric oxide as adjunctive therapy for severe malaria: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0946-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Hawkes, Andrea L. Conroy, Robert O. Opoka, Laura Hermann, Kevin E. Thorpe, Chloe McDonald, Hani Kim, Sarah Higgins, Sophie Namasopo, Chandy John, Chris Miller, W. Conrad Liles, Kevin C. Kain

Abstract

Severe malaria remains a major cause of childhood mortality globally. Decreased endothelial nitric oxide is associated with severe and fatal malaria. The hypothesis was that adjunctive inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) would improve outcomes in African children with severe malaria. A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of iNO at 80 ppm by non-rebreather mask versus room air placebo as adjunctive treatment to artesunate in children with severe malaria was conducted. The primary outcome was the longitudinal course of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), an endothelial biomarker of malaria severity and clinical outcome. One hundred and eighty children were enrolled; 88 were assigned to iNO and 92 to placebo (all received IV artesunate). Ang-2 levels measured over the first 72 h of hospitalization were not significantly different between groups. The mortality at 48 h was similar between groups [6/87 (6.9 %) in the iNO group vs 8/92 (8.7 %) in the placebo group; OR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.26-2.3; p = 0.65]. Clinical recovery times and parasite clearance kinetics were similar (p > 0.05). Methaemoglobinaemia >7 % occurred in 25 % of patients receiving iNO and resolved without sequelae. The incidence of neurologic deficits (<14 days), acute kidney injury, hypoglycaemia, anaemia, and haemoglobinuria was similar between groups (p > 0.05). iNO at 80 ppm administered by non-rebreather mask was safe but did not affect circulating levels of Ang-2. Alternative methods of enhancing endothelial NO bioavailability may be necessary to achieve a biological effect and improve clinical outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01255215.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Professor 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,860,054
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,052
of 5,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,623
of 284,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#49
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.