You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative impacts of human-induced climate change and natural climate variability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1038/17789 |
| Authors |
Mike Hulme, Elaine M. Barrow, Nigel W. Arnell, Paula A. Harrison, Timothy C. Johns, Thomas E. Downing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 346 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 92 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 62 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Engineering | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,338,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#51,936
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,918
of 103,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#62
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.