↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Safety of Lorcaserin in Overweight or Obese Patients

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular Safety of Lorcaserin in Overweight or Obese Patients
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1808721
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin A Bohula, Stephen D Wiviott, Darren K McGuire, Silvio E Inzucchi, Julia Kuder, KyungAh Im, Christina L Fanola, Arman Qamar, Conville Brown, Andrzej Budaj, Armando Garcia-Castillo, Milan Gupta, Lawrence A Leiter, Neil J Weissman, Harvey D White, Tushar Patel, Bruce Francis, Wenfeng Miao, Carlos Perdomo, Shobha Dhadda, Marc P Bonaca, Christian T Ruff, Anthony C Keech, Steven R Smith, Marc S Sabatine, Benjamin M Scirica

Abstract

Background Lorcaserin, a selective serotonin 2C receptor agonist that modulates appetite, has proven efficacy for weight management in overweight or obese patients. The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of lorcaserin are undefined. Methods We randomly assigned 12,000 overweight or obese patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors to receive either lorcaserin (10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary safety outcome of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) was assessed at an interim analysis to exclude a noninferiority boundary of 1.4. If noninferiority was met, the primary cardiovascular efficacy outcome (a composite of major cardiovascular events, heart failure, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization [extended major cardiovascular events]) was assessed for superiority at the end of the trial. Results At 1 year, weight loss of at least 5% had occurred in 1986 of 5135 patients (38.7%) in the lorcaserin group and in 883 of 5083 (17.4%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.74 to 3.30; P<0.001). Patients in the lorcaserin group had slightly better values with respect to cardiac risk factors (including blood pressure, heart rate, glycemic control, and lipids) than those in the placebo group. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the rate of the primary safety outcome was 2.0% per year in the lorcaserin group and 2.1% per year in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.14; P<0.001 for noninferiority); the rate of extended major cardiovascular events was 4.1% per year and 4.2% per year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.07; P=0.55). Adverse events of special interest were uncommon, and the rates were generally similar in the two groups, except for a higher number of patients with serious hypoglycemia in the lorcaserin group (13 vs. 4, P=0.04). Conclusions In a high-risk population of overweight or obese patients, lorcaserin facilitated sustained weight loss without a higher rate of major cardiovascular events than that with placebo. (Funded by Eisai; CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02019264 .).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 315 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 335 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 32 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Master 21 6%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 112 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 133 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1328. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#10,029
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#484
of 32,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169
of 344,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.